Health Universe
Platform

The platform

AI-native Workspace

Isolated, compliant environment

Unified Patient Record

TEFCA + SMART on FHIR

Run Agents

Navigator, Routines, Roster

User

Role

EM

Dr. Elena Marsh

You

elena.marsh@oncologysuite.org

Admin

MR

Marcus Reed

marcus.reed@oncologysuite.org

Member

PS

Priya Shah

priya.shah@oncologysuite.org

Viewer

Explore Navigator

See how Navigator runs inside the clinical workflow

Use Cases

Oncology Suite

Records Summarization

Denial Avoidance

OncoEMR Visit Preparation

Schedule

Completed

·

116 runs

Sync OncoEMR Appointments

Summarize Each Appointment

Case study

How a cancer center scaled its oncology workflow

Who we serve

Customer story

Why leading health systems build on Health Universe

Company

New Research

Research

See the research behind the platform

Login

Request a Demo

Request a Demo

Login

Case study · Trial Matching

Duke and iCubed built a full oncology trial in 7.5 days.

Duke Clinical Research Institute & iCubed

Dr. Christoph Hornik

MD, MPH Associate Director of i-Cubed, Duke Clinical Research Center

Duke Clinical Research Institute & iCubed

Health Universe brings the platform discipline needed to generate, test, and improve AI agents for clinical trials.

Request a Demo

Setup

7.5 days

To stand up a full oncology trial, down from 6–9 months

Speed

30–40×

Faster end to end — a 93% reduction in setup time

Precision

37%

Fewer false-positive strong matches — ~15 fewer dead-end reviews per patient

The challenge

Months to build a trial, and matching that never reads the chart.

For Duke and iCubed, standing up a trial took six to nine months by hand, and matching is manual, slow, and buried in false positives — because keyword matching scores patients eligible without ever reading the chart.

Fewer than 5% of adult cancer patients enroll in a trial, even when they may be eligible.

What they needed

01

To stand up a trial protocol far faster than six-to-nine months of manual work

02

Matching that actually reads the full patient record, not just keywords

03

A dramatic reduction in false-positive “strong matches” that waste coordinator time

04

Transparent, inspectable reasoning on every match, with the final call left to the team

The difference

Why they chose Health Universe

Building a trial and finding its patients were two slow, disconnected jobs, usually solved by two tools months apart. Only Health Universe did both on one platform — and showed its work at every step.

Generates the whole trial, not fragments

From a synopsis, 12+ coordinated agents produce the full protocol and the regulatory submissions needed to launch.

Reads the chart, not keywords

Each patient's full record is evaluated against the criteria, catching age and logic errors baseline tools miss.

Shows and ranks its reasoning

Every match carries its clinical logic, and coordinators make the final eligibility call.

In practice

The Approach

A coordinated team of 12+ agents turned a synopsis into the full protocol plus IRB and ClinicalTrials.gov submissions, end to end, with audit trails the research team reviewed and approved. The same platform then read each patient's full record against the criteria and ranked the matches by clinical reasoning.

Before Health Universe

After Health Universe

Trial setup time

6–9 months by hand

7.5 days — 30–40× faster, a 93% reduction

Protocol creation

Manual, fragmented

12+ agents produce a 75-page protocol from a synopsis

Regulatory submissions

Manual

IRB + ClinicalTrials.gov automated end to end

Matching basis

Keyword scoring, no chart read

Full-record reading with inspectable reasoning

False positives

High — reviews buried in dead ends

37% fewer false-positive strong matches

Trial setup time

Before

6–9 months by hand

After

7.5 days — 30–40× faster, a 93% reduction

Protocol creation

Before

Manual, fragmented

After

12+ agents produce a 75-page protocol from a synopsis

Regulatory submissions

Before

Manual

After

IRB + ClinicalTrials.gov automated end to end

Matching basis

Before

Keyword scoring, no chart read

After

Full-record reading with inspectable reasoning

False positives

Before

High — reviews buried in dead ends

After

37% fewer false-positive strong matches

Proof

The Results

Trial setup went from six-to-nine months to seven and a half days.

Evaluated against a real oncology trial using actual trial standards, Project Loom delivered 10× faster document processing, +21% higher matching precision at identical discriminative accuracy (ROC AUC) — and about 15 fewer dead-end reviews per patient.

Setup

7.5 days

To stand up a full oncology trial, down from 6–9 months

Speed

30–40×

Faster end to end — a 93% reduction in setup time

Precision

37%

Fewer false-positive strong matches — ~15 fewer dead-end reviews per patient

Trial Matching

Working with Health Universe on Project Loom allowed us to develop AI agents that move beyond isolated tasks to support the full, end-to-end clinical trial workflow.

Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez

Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez

Executive Director of i-Cubed · Duke Clinical Research Center

Bring us your toughest case.

See these outcomes reproduced on your own charts, live with our team.

Request a Demo